1. PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RESPIRATION
Photosynthesis began about 3 billion years ago; respiration began about 0.6 billion years ago.1 Photosynthesis is carried out by green plants, which take carbon dioxide from the air and release oxygen as a byproduct. Respiration is carried out by animals, which take oxygen from the air and release carbon dioxide as a byproduct. How many plants and animals are they?
In Nature, there is a dynamic balance between photosynthesis and respiration. Too much photosynthesis reduces the amount of carbon dioxide in the air and leads to cooling of the lower atmosphere; conversely, too much respiration increases the amount of carbon dioxide in the air, leading to warming of the lower atmosphere.2 Figure 1 shows the composition of the Earth's atmosphere through geologic time. The current levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide are about 21% and 0.04%, respectively.
For the past 250 years, but more intently for the past 100 years, humans have been engaged in an experiment of global proportions, by pursuing a type of development seemingly at odds with Nature. In effect, by fabricating artificial animals, humans have been increasing the amount of respiration, while at the same time decreasing the amount of photosynthesis by eliminating a significant number of plants through deforestation and the paving of formerly productive lands. The net effect is a double whammy, which is reflected in the sustained warming of the lower atmosphere over the past several decades.
To put it in numbers: The concentration of carbon dioxide in the lower atmosphere has increased from 290 ppm at the turn of the 20th century to 400 ppm at the present time (2015). In the past 25 years alone, the concentration of carbon dioxide has increased at an average rate of 1.5 ppm per year.
2. THE PROPORTIONS OF NATURE
If photosynthesis and respiration are indeed opposite processes, and if they both draw their inputs from the lower atmosphere, the concentration of the inputs should roughly parallel the existing mass in the terrestrial bank. The ratio of oxygen to carbon dioxide in the atmosphere should reflect the ratio of floral to faunal mass on the Earth's surface. Let's look at the first ratio, using the 1900 value for CO2:
The total floral biomass in the Earth is difficult to estimate precisely [Fig. 2 (a)]. The total live biomass is about 560,000,000,000 tons of carbon (C) (Wikipedia: Biomass). In terms of organic matter (CH2O), the amount is about 1,400,000,000,000 tons. The total dry faunal biomass, including humans, is estimated to be about 2,500,000,000 tons (Wikipedia: Biomass) [Fig. 2 (b)]. Therefore, the ratio of floral to faunal biomass is:
Given the fact that the numbers in Eq. 2 are only rough estimates, it can be concluded that there is an approximate proportionality between the two ratios. Thus:
The dry biomass of humans is about 100,000,000 tons. In terms of respiration, one automobile is equivalent to about three persons.3 Thus, we can add about 300,000,000 tons to the natural faunal biomass to get the total equivalent faunal biomass, i.e., 2,800,000,000 tons. At the same time, the concentration of carbon dioxide has increased to 400 ppm. Thus, the present ratios are:
These calculations constitute only a start, because they do not consider the decrease in floral biomass from stage 1 (1900) to stage 2 (2014), or the additional increase in equivalent faunal biomass, since vehicles other than automobiles have not been included in stage 2. When these factors are considered in Eq. 5, it can be seen that the coefficients of Eqs. 3 and 6 may not be too different after all. [Note that the calculations shown here are not intended to depict actual numbers; only general trends].
3. THE SOLUTION
The solution is simple in theory but very difficult in practice (and the naysayers will say almost impossible):
Yet, humans have been doing exactly the opposite for the past 100 years.
Transportation based on fossil fuels is the culprit, and the
paving of roads to facilitate transportation
exacerbates the problem
Barring putting a halt to development, the only feasible course appears to be carbon sequestration, i.e., extracting carbon from the atmosphere and depositing it somewhere out of sight. This will accomplish the same feat as if we had somehow developed a way of producing artificial plants. Yet technically and economically feasible carbon sequestration remains a long way from being a solution to this intensely human predicament.
1 Cloud, P., and A. Gibor. 1970.
The oxygen cycle.
Scientific American, Vol. 223, No. 3, September, 111-123.
2Ponce, V. M. (Undated). The science of global warming: Good, bad, or ugly? Online feature.
3Ponce, V. M. (Undated). The global warning puzzle: How many people does one car amount to? Online feature.
4Ponce, V. M., and S. Kumar. (1999). Global climate change, sustainable development, and environmental ethics. Revista de Estudos Ambientais, Vol. 1, No. 1, January/April, 19-26.