CIV E 632-COMPUTATIONAL HYDRAULICS AND HYDROLOGY
SPRING 2018
MIDTERM EXAM
MARCH 5, 2018, 1900-2015
Name: _________________ Red ID ________________ Grade: __________
|
Instructions: Closed book, closed notes. Answer only ten (10) questions.
Use engineering paper.
When you are finished, staple your work in sequence,
and return this sheet with your work.
|
- Compare the celerity and attenuation properties of kinematic, diffusion, dynamic, and gravity (inertia-pressure) waves. State in tabular form.
- What do overland flow and slow-rising flood waves have in common that they lend themselves to description by kinematic and diffusion wave models?
- What is the main message of Cunge's paper on the Muskingum method?
- What are the differences between constant and variable-parameter Muskingum-Cunge routing? State in tabular form.
- Compare the unit hydrograph and the overland flow methods in terms of their ability to simulate watershed rainfall-runoff.
- What is the Courant number?
What Courant number optimizes numerical diffusion and minimizes numerical dispersion in Muskingum-Cunge routing?
- What is grid independence in the context of numerical modeling? Is the convex method grid independent? Why, or why not?
- Were Hromadka and DeVries correct in stating (1988) that the convex method was better than the kinematic wave method of HEC-HMS? Explain.
- What is the cause of attenuation in unsteady open-channel flow?
- Under what four physical conditions is the kinematic shock more likely to develop?
- How do the Hayami, Dooge, and Ponce hydraulic diffusivities differ from each other?
- What are the two (dimensionless)
parameters describing convection, diffusion and
dispersion in a dimensionless treatment of flood wave propagation?
|